-
A new study by the U.S. Geological Survey revealed that ocean levels on the U.S. Atlantic coast are rising three times faster than the global average. The Northeast "hotspot" includes the coastline from Cape Hatteras, N.C., to Boston. Major American cities are at greater risk for increased flooding and storm damage.
Which cities? Click through to find out.
New York, N.Y.
You might think the financial crisis has Wall Street underwater today, but a century from now New York might really be swimming. By 2100, sea levels in New York are expected to rise 7.8 to 11.4 inches more than the worldwide average of three feet. Instead of flooding once every few years, the Big Apple could see many heavy floods annually.
-
Washington, D.C.
Look out, Mr. President! Just because the nation's capital isn't on the Atlantic doesn't mean the East Coast city is in the clear. Washington, D.C. rests safely on the banks of the Potomac River, but by 2150, part of the city might be underwater. In about 100 years, as many as 73 monuments and museums on the National Mall could be affected.
-
Norfolk, Va.
There are some competitions you'd rather not win. Unfortunately for the city of Norfolk, Va., having the fastest-rising sea level of any city on the Atlantic coast will only mean headaches. While the average national sea-level rise is around 3.1 millimeters per year, in Norfolk they could soon be expecting as much as 6 millimeters annually.
-
Baltimore, Md.
If sea levels keep rising at increasing rates, Oriole Park might soon have a waterfront view. Baltimore curls around an arm of Chesapeake Bay, and the city center sits at sea level on the harbor. Due to rising sea levels, climatologists say that chances of heavy flooding in the area will double by 2030.
-
Montauk, N.Y.
You might want to think twice before splurging for a beach house in the East Hampton hamlet of Montauk. The New York town sits at the tip of Long Island, and like the rest of the Northeast, it's feeling the heat from rising seas.
-
Boston, Mass.
The most northern city in the affected region, Boston resides right on Massachusetts Bay, leaving it particularly vulnerable to flood damage. From updating building codes to identifying at-risk areas, city and state officials have already begun preparing for the rising waters. In anticipation of future flooding, the New England Aquarium moved its electrical systems from the basement to higher floors. Other businesses will no doubt follow suit.
-
Cape Hatteras, N.C.
Cape Hatteras Lighthouse was built in 1870. But thanks to a receding shoreline, the 4,830-ton building had to be moved inland nearly 3,000 feet in 1999. The lighthouse now sits 1,500 feet from the shore (the same distance as it was back in 1870), but if sea levels keep rising at an increasing rate, the historic structure might have to move yet again before the end of the century.
-
Providence, R.I.
Since 1929, sea levels near this waterfront Rhode Island city have risen nearly a foot, resulting in a variety of changes. Flooding has increased, and fresh-water wetlands have turned into salt marsh. In 2008, the city adopted a plan for gathering information, regulating new development and combating damage.
-
Annapolis, Md.
The home of the U.S. Naval Academy might need another line of defense -- against the sea. Annapolis, which looks out over Chesapeake Bay, stands to lose ground to rising waters in the coming years.
-
Next: Hottest and Coldest Places on Earth
Atlantic City, N.J.
Sea levels are predicted to rise 15 inches in Atlantic City by 2050, and six inches as soon as 2030. But changes are coming before that. By 2020, the odds of a storm surge four feet above the high-water mark will be one in six, a sobering statistic for the party city.
Comments
Add a Comment
15 Comments
...ok, here it is. So how long did it take Companies in this Nation to stop poisoning the atmosphere???? Look that one up!! I'll tell you this: The more you deny these issues the more damage you create!! In keeping things the way they are for self interest only makes the future on earth look dim!!!
March 09 2013 at 1:02 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWhen the obscene rate of skin cancer increased, and when the temperatures begin escalating and the glaciers and snows began melting, the oceans got warmer, and the lakes and rivers began flooding, only did a few of you start to notice. Self-interest is not a bad thing, the fact that you lie about it......is!!! And at levels that is much greater than the Universe allows!!! You still don't get what other advanced societies in this Universe get, "what hurts one, hurts many" or "what benefits the few, must benefit the many" or ultimately, benefits no one. With you people it's the opposite, what hurts one is ignored by the many, and what benefits the few is denied by many!!
Your definition of "self interest" is very narrow, barely reaching past the individual being to his loved ones -- and to those only when they do his bidding.
You have barely reached 1st grade in this Universe!!!!
You can be advanced in you technology, but if you are not advanced in your thinking you cannot create advancement, what only comes out of that thought system, is demise!!! You are deemed a very dangerous society. You call a primitive society or an advanced society based on how high it understands. But what good are understanding if you don't practice them or put them into place!!! You going backwards??? You were more compassionate a century ago then you are now!!!!
What I'm saying here, is a civilization at one time destroyed itself. It's technology was far beyond it's spiritual evolution --- they made it's technology it's God. You cannot worship technologies and all it brings, for it will in the end destroy itself. Atlantis and Lemuria were the very civilizations.
Wake-up and know you must move forward or.....do I need to tell you!!!!!
You may want to read The Last Hours Of Ancient Sunlight by Thom Hartmann
A wonderful messenger, and will guide you where you need to go!!
World without end!!!
Climate Crisis Emergency is indeed upon us according to the UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS from major universities, Dr. Richard Hansen Chief NASA climatologist of Columbia U. , The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of the UN made up of climatologists from around the globe, The World Bank report, "Turn Down the Heat" declaring that the world economy will be wrecked by global warming. Floods that will destroy cities and people, droughts that will destroy farmlands, super storms, earthquakes, etc. will ensue as the glaciers melt and flood coastal lands, and then the great rivers will dry up unable to irrigate farmlands. It will be hell on Earth until the Earth finally becomes uninhabitable and no humans will survive, if any life at all survives. Perhaps cockroaches or lizards if that. It is the GREAT TRAGEDY, the greatest moral issue in all human history, and lies from the rightwing' Teeth Party of the Repugnants will destroy all life because of cronism to the fossil fuel industrialists like the Koch Bros., Exxon, Chevron, Mobil, BP, and the tar sands developers of Alberta, Canada, etc. The young are in for a Hell on Earth and the little children will hardly survive at all. It breaks my heart that too many people are so dull and stupid and that they cannot see the truth staring them in the face from every corner fo the Earth. 20 million climate refugees in Pakistan, 90,000 in the Philippines, how many millions in Haiti and from Katrina, Irene, Sandy, etc. etc. CLIMATE CRISIS EMERGENCY IS NOW UPON US BIG TIME AND THERE IS LITTLE TIME TO SAVE THE HABITALBE EARTH, and that's the fact! Even the World Bank, hardly a green org. says so. But, oddly, no one on corrupt Wall St. fed by the rightwing Wall St. Journal has read it! Greenpeace and Bill McKibben and Al Gore are warning NOT to develop the filthy tar sands of Canada, but who will listen. If Obama okays the Keystone XL pipeline, there is little chance if any to save the planet. Environmentalists are warning that burning those filthy, counter productive tar sands means game over for the habitable planet. Yet, with true political will and true effort, ALL THE TECHNOLOGY EXISTS TO SAVE US IN GEOTHERMAL, WIND AND SOLAR ENERGIES THAT COULD EASILY POWER THE ENTIRE PLANET. YETS, WE ARE IN A STRANGLE HOLD BY FOSSIL FUEL CORPORATE GREED OVER THE SURVIVAL OF LIFE, AS IF MONEY CAN BUY LOVE OR LIFE ON A DYING PLANET OF CLIMATE REFUGEES. WE EXPECT 5 MILLION PER YEAR SOON! THERE'S ONLY A DECADE OR SO LEFT TO TURN THINGS AROUND. THAT IS THE TRUTH. ALL ELSE IS LIES AND PROFIT MOTIVE BY FOSSIL FUEL PROPAGANDISTS.
March 06 2013 at 2:28 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down Replyexcept for a couple of comments from people who definitely don't know anything about how shifts in the ocean currents, cause the geology of global temperature changes. It is a phenomenon that happens, as has been stated, about every 150-75 years. Get out some text books, and take a course in ocean currents and how they are responsible for weather changes. The money spent for that will be a lot more than lining the pockets of so called, know it all, political pundits.
July 25 2012 at 8:34 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplySome people want see climate change as a political issue. The weather is not influenced by one's political leanings. The weather IS influenced by ocean currents, and those are changing. We've been mapping currents for over a century, so you can measure shifts. Political motivation about climate change is no different than than it was when the church insisted that the Earth was the center of the universe, and were happy to murder people with a different opinion. Nothing has changed.
July 03 2012 at 8:08 AM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyThe historic fact remains that when science and politics have clashed, the political opposition is always motivated by the desire to maintain the the status quo. Science has no 'agenda', no motivation but to just pay attention to what's right in front of you.
Since the right doesn't believe in science, I guess they won't believe in this - but global warming, rising waters and drowning will believe in them
July 03 2012 at 12:52 AM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplySo you believe this so called science, but you do not believe that science can resolve this issue in the next 50 to 100 years. That is the time frame we are talking about, not next week.
January 16 2013 at 1:52 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyThe right is having a hard time understanding the rising oceans ,being they believe the earth is flat and if the water rises it should just run off the edges.
April 20 2013 at 1:17 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyWell thanks for the important information, But I must assume the most of us are waiting for the big shoe to drop from our government on the biggest tax increase in the world history that is coming. Then the water will really be over our heads no matter where we live..
July 01 2012 at 8:10 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyThank you for parroting Rush Limbaugh's debunked false information.
July 03 2012 at 12:06 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWell, I guess you assume wrongly, since most of us are too smart to fall for propaganda.
July 03 2012 at 12:49 AM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyWow! I haven't read the full article yet, but I'd have thought "sea level" to rise or fall at an equal rate around the globe. How can it rise faster in one place than it does in another...?
June 26 2012 at 10:08 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyPrevailing ocean currents? Me no know. Just guessing.
July 01 2012 at 5:13 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyKim Stanley Robinson wrote a wonderful (terrifying) trilogy about this very issue several years ago: Forty Signs of Rain/Fifty Degrees and Falling and Sixty Days and Counting. He explains it beautifully in the books, with sea surge/ocean currents and the pull of the moon, as to why sea level rise will have more effect on certain areas than on others. In the end, the planet will get along just fine without humans...we, however, will not get along without the planet. Regardless of HOW climate change is happening...it IS happening. and if we, humans, can do anything to 'make it better', we SHOULD. There was just a devestating storm/power outage in the eastern states. What if that were the NORM? Third world country stuff. How would YOU adapt? It seems to be coming....
July 02 2012 at 10:35 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyThe recent " devestating storm/power outage in the eastern states" has indeed become the norm. Any wind over 40 mph devastates the Mid Atlantic (PEPCO) area. The storm was neither hurricane nor tornado, so it shouldn't have been so devastating, but the power outage was real and occurs at least once every winter and every summer for the last decade or so. So, your question is a very good and relevant one. Just because people are forced to accept a week without power, I really don't see them remaining "peaceful" for two weeks of those conditions and no one seems to be doing anything about this. Certainly not the power company!!
July 25 2012 at 4:13 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate downm75055675@gmail.com
June 26 2012 at 4:41 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down Reply